London: After a report related to the UK Home Ministry was leaked, Britain was threatened by Hindu nationalism and Khalistani supporters, mentioning the riots in Leicester

Related Articles

A passenger plane of PSA Airlines collided with an army helicopter and fell into a river near Washington DC, there were 60 passengers on board the plane, many people are feared dead

13 hours ago

Delhi Assembly Election: Aam Aadmi Party’s national convenor Arvind Kejriwal is busy campaigning for the Delhi assembly elections. He told in Badli assembly constituency what he will do first if AAP wins the election.

13 hours ago

Delhi Crime: Cash, several liquor bottles and Aam Aadmi Party pamphlets recovered from a suspicious vehicle in Delhi, ‘Punjab Government’ written on the vehicle

14 hours ago

London: Many shocking revelations have come to the fore after a report related to the UK Home Ministry was leaked. According to the report, Britain is threatened by Hindu nationalism and Khalistani supporters. The leaked document includes 9 types of threats present in Britain. It says that Britain needs to deal with these threats. The report also mentions Islamism, right wing and left wing. For the first time in the British Home Ministry report, Hindu nationalism and Hindutva have been identified as worrying ideologies.

Mention of riots in Leicester
The reason for including Hindu nationalism as a threat is believed to be the riots in Leicester in 2022. On August 28, 2022, there were clashes between British Muslims of Hindu and South Asian origin after the India-Pakistan Asia Cup match.

There is concern about Khalistani supporters
The report has raised concerns about Khalistani supporters. The report also raised concerns over India’s actions abroad, including allegations of its alleged involvement in violence against Sikhs in Canada and the US.

Also read
Meanwhile, UK Home Office Security Minister Dan Jarvis told the House of Commons that it was ‘not entirely clear which version of the report has been leaked’. He also stressed that the report’s claims did not represent government policy.